Who will win the big game? Defining NBA and NHL Champions

The 2009-2010 NBA Finals and NHL Stanley Cup finals are pending. Which factors ultimately determine the prize pools? What qualities can help you determine which team will win the final prize? Sports fans may be interested in sporting articles in this article. Sports organizations and leaders can be more interested in our research projects and how we can help teams optimize their chances of winning.

After analyzing the NFL, NBA, Major League Baseball and NHL championship matches, and the major golf and tennis finals, 50 championship titles were identified in our book, "Who Wins the Great Game?". Psychological and mathematical methods. "Based on similar research, we focused on a number of championship qualities that can help predict the NHL and NBA winners.

This article focuses on a dynamic like leadership, defense, and consistency – this year's finals – and apply to all major sports It is statistically demonstrated that both drivers and coaches have the ability to motivate their teams to size. Trainers such as Lakers & Phil Jackson, and the best results in the finals as a random mathematical model to predict at Phil Jackson's 10-2 NBA finals, such as Red Auerbach, John Wooden, Chuck Knoll, Bobby Bowden, Scotty Bowman and Al Arbor.

Leadership in court is key. Over the past 20 years, it has the right offensive team , the number of points per game was 14-6 (70.0%) in the NBA championship. This factor prefers Lakers and Kobe Bryant, 27.0 points for the season average for the game.

Likewise, better offensive hockey teams have been in the Stanley Cup Final for 19-11 (63.3%) over the past 30 years. This factor supports Black Hawks and Patrick Kane (88 points) over Flyers and Mike Richards (62 points).


In all the sports we've been studying, defense is indeed a victory. Our research has confirmed this in Super Bowl and World Series. This sentence is true of the Stanley Cup finals and the NBA championship. In the past 30 years, the hockey team with a percentage saving of better matches went to 18-11 (62.2%). Since the high scoring period since the mid-'80 to the mid-1990s, the defense of hockey was even stronger. Teams with better savings have gone:

• 3-0 in the last 4 years (teams have achieved the same savings percentage over a year),

• 6-1 in the last 8 years,

and 13-4 over the last 18 years.

This factor favors Philadelphia Flyers with a 907% savings rate against the Chicago Black Hawks and their 90 percent savings.

Defense also helps basketball teams win a championship title. We note that, on average, defensive factors correlate more to victory championships than offensive factors. Over the past 20 years, the team with better defenses ranged from 13 to 7 (65.0%) in the NBA championship. This factor favors the Celtics (95.6 points per game) this season. The Lakers raise 97.0 points during the regular season.

Consistency Factors

The second key to profit is consistency. Interestingly, this kind of "consistency factor" is typically related to "less exciting heroes" than most sports fans expect. For example, in baseball, our research shows that the blow is an average correlation with winning the World Series, like home run.

Likewise, in the NBA Finals, the percentage of target goals is more important than the three-point shot percentage. Over the past 20 years, the ratio of the right field goals went to 12-7 (63.2%) in the professional basketball championship. This factor favors Celtics this year with a 48.3% FG% against Lakers & 45.7%.

Championship Factors and 2010 Finals

So who will win the Stanley Cup Finals? # 2 Black Hawks are a big favorite of # 7 seeded Flyers (about 2.5-1 favorites), but Flyers certainly have a leading role on the bench and the gates to make a series.

The NBA Finals is an interesting dilemma. Leadership factors apply to Lakers (coaches and star leaders), but other factors (defense and consistency) favor Celtics.

Source by SBOBET

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *